BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CeMEAS - ECPv6.17.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CeMEAS
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.cemeas.de
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CeMEAS
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20150329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20151025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20160327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20161030T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20170326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20171029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20130331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20131027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20140330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20141026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20150329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20151025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20160327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20161030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20160718T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20160722T180000
DTSTAMP:20160705T114645Z
CREATED:20160705T114645Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20160705T114645Z
UID:5412-1468828800-1469210400@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:Summer School Göttingen SPIRIT 2016. "Beyond the City Limits: Rethinking New Religiosities in Asia."
DESCRIPTION:Summer School\nSummer School Göttingen SPIRIT 2016. “Beyond the City Limits: Rethinking New Religiosities in Asia.” \n18-22 July 2016. University of Göttingen\, Germany\nGöttingen Institute for Social and Cultural Anthropology (GISCA)\, Centre for Modern Indian Studies (CeMIS) & Centre for Modern East Asian Studies (CeMEAS) \nTheme\nWith the rapid urbanization across Asia\, with new cityscapes\, glittering skyscrapers\, shopping malls\, globalized forms of consumption it is easy to assume that cities are the primary sites for the production of the new. Indeed\, urbanity is often used as a synonym for modernity and Asian futures would appear to be increasingly urban. The study of religion is no exception\, and emergent trends\, practices and movements are often implicitly or explicitly connected with the city. For example\, new religious movements are commonly treated as distinctly urban phenomena that reflect middle class sensibilities and subjectivities\, concerns and consumption patterns. Moreover\, the rise of new religious forms is often understood as coming at the expense of the rural\, as when village mediumship practices are seen to give way to urban spirit cults\, or when so-called “forest monasteries” in Thailand increasingly find themselves in urban or peri-urban zones. \nBut if cities are the future\, is the country then the past? Does the focus on cities as sites of “the new” ignore the complex ways rural contexts\, settings and imaginaries are implicated and contribute to contemporary religious practice? And to what extent does the notion of “urban religion” implicitly depend on its “others”? Does it reproduce the urban/rural distinction as one of the “great divides”  (Latour 1993) that have been central to the experience of modernity? In truth\, it is increasingly difficult to sustain sharp distinctions between rural and urban. Across Asia\, increased mobility especially patterns of rural/urban migration and the spread of communications and transport technologies connect urban and rural settings like never before improved education rates have seen the rise of an increasingly sophisticated\, cosmopolitan and politically engaged rural population. Yet nationalist constructions of identity and modernizing discourses across Asia have at once denigrated the rural\, “the peasantry”\, as backwards and in need of “development” while at the same time valorizing them as embodying traditional values and the essence of national identities. Religion is similarly implicated in such discourses\, at times standing for the “other” of modernity\, at others functioning as the locus of ethnic or national identities. \nYet so-called urban and rural religious practices do not constitute two opposed spheres of activity but are interconnected in various ways. Indeed\, it is frequently the very notion of an opposition between city and country that facilitates interactions and networks that traverse urban and rural contexts. For example\, urban religious institutions may recruit ritual specialists from the countryside because they are seen to have retained “correct” knowledge and techniques that urban practitioners have lost (Davis 2016)\, or city dwellers may see rural settings as sites of spiritual potential and seek out sites of pilgrimage\, of refuge or retreat. \nThis Summer School takes up these issues and asks how the study of contemporary religious life in Asia can benefit from “thinking beyond the city”\, whether “the city” is understood as a spatial entity\, a site of enquiry\, or as an analytical category. It will call into question many of the assumptions that go along with the study of urban religiosity and will attempt to bring “the urban” explicitly into relationship with its various “others” – such as the “rural”\, “hinterland”\, “periphery”\, or “village”. Central questions include: How do patterns of pilgrimage\, travel and tourism\, or the circulation of religious symbols or objects connect “urban” and “rural”? How do religious networks and practices help particular actors – such as rural/urban migrants – to negotiate tensions between their rural and urban lives? How do notions of nostalgia and pastness figure in projects of urban religio-spiritual renewal? How do dialectics of religion\, secularity and rationality play out in rural/urban spaces? And to what extent does the notion of an urban/rural divide itself inform religious practices and imaginaries? A final avenue of questioning focuses on the hierarchization of city and country and the relative superiority and agency attributed to the former. Just as postcolonial and critical theory have\nchallenged discourses that contrast a dynamic and active occident with a relatively static\, passive orient\, the Summer School will critically examine the manner in which similar distinctions between city and country have inflected the study of religion in Asia. It will ask how “provincializing” the city can lead to new insights and approaches that can reveal blindspots and draw attention to power differentials in Asian societies. The purpose would be to challenge the processes of othering that assign a relatively passive or reactive role for the countryside and to instead draw attention to the agency of rural actors\, to alternative imaginaries of the future\, and to ask what role religion plays in specifically rural modernities. \nThe summer school thus invites participants to engage with\, and develop\, their own work through an exploration of the way religion and spirituality intersect with three key themes: (1) traversing and transcending the rural/urban divide; (2) the city and its “others”; (3) provincializing the city. A range of international speakers has been invited whose collective expertise connects questions of rural/urban religiosities and critical engagements with the category of “the city” in contemporary Asia. An innovative approach of this Summer School is to include both scholars who work on religion and those do not but whose research aims to critically engage with the category of “the city”. This combination of perspectives is expected to produce stimulating exchange and novel insights. \nSpeakers will include: \n\nProf. Michael Herzfeld\, Harvard University\nProf. Ursula Rao\, Leipzig University\nProf. Christina Schwenkel\, UC Riverside\nProf. Julia Huang\, National Tsing Hua University\, Taiwan (tentative)\nDr. Radhika Gupta\, Göttingen University\n\nProf. Herzfeld will provide a public keynote as well as a general workshop on successful thesis writing. Podium discussions and morning lectures will provide theoretical frames and ethnographic snapshots from diverse Asian contexts. In addition\, students will participate in small working and reading groups moderated and mentored by each of the invited speakers over the course of the School. Mandatory readings for these sessions will be shared in advance. Participants will have the opportunity to introduce their own work in working groups\, to connect their research to each of the three theme blocs\, in order to develop new ideas and learn new approaches for their own work. \nHighlights of the cultural program include: \n\nA visit to the historic Bodenwerder synagogue from 1825\, which was translocated to Göttingen in 2006 to find out about the transformation of religious sites in a local context.\nA city tour\, including guided tours of historically significant cemeteries.\n\nAbout the organizers\nGISCA\, CEMIS and CeMEAS are key institutions building research\, network and outreach capacities in the study of religions at Göttingen Research campus (GRC). Bringing together scholars in the social sciences and humanities for inter-disciplinary dialogue\, they in particular foster an appreciation of regional diversity and intra- and cross-regional entanglements in Asia. With GISCA’s expertise in the anthropology of Southeast Asia and CEMIS and CeMEAS core competence in South and East Asia respectively\, these centers complement each other\, join creative forces and pool their excellent academic networks to organize this Summer School. \nContact\nKarin Klenke at karin.klenke@cemis.uni-goettingen.de\nhttps://www.uni-goettingen.de/de/531996.html
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/summer-school-gottingen-spirit-2016-beyond-city-limits-rethinking-new-religiosities-asia-2/
LOCATION:Kulturwissenschaftliches Zentrum (KWZ)
CATEGORIES:Conference,Lecture,Workshop
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20160718T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20160722T180000
DTSTAMP:20160705T114645Z
CREATED:20160705T114645Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20160705T114645Z
UID:4283-1468828800-1469210400@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:Summer School Göttingen SPIRIT 2016. "Beyond the City Limits: Rethinking New Religiosities in Asia."
DESCRIPTION:Summer School\nSummer School Göttingen SPIRIT 2016. “Beyond the City Limits: Rethinking New Religiosities in Asia.” \n18-22 July 2016. University of Göttingen\, Germany\nGöttingen Institute for Social and Cultural Anthropology (GISCA)\, Centre for Modern Indian Studies (CeMIS) & Centre for Modern East Asian Studies (CeMEAS) \nTheme\nWith the rapid urbanization across Asia\, with new cityscapes\, glittering skyscrapers\, shopping malls\, globalized forms of consumption it is easy to assume that cities are the primary sites for the production of the new. Indeed\, urbanity is often used as a synonym for modernity and Asian futures would appear to be increasingly urban. The study of religion is no exception\, and emergent trends\, practices and movements are often implicitly or explicitly connected with the city. For example\, new religious movements are commonly treated as distinctly urban phenomena that reflect middle class sensibilities and subjectivities\, concerns and consumption patterns. Moreover\, the rise of new religious forms is often understood as coming at the expense of the rural\, as when village mediumship practices are seen to give way to urban spirit cults\, or when so-called “forest monasteries” in Thailand increasingly find themselves in urban or peri-urban zones. \nBut if cities are the future\, is the country then the past? Does the focus on cities as sites of “the new” ignore the complex ways rural contexts\, settings and imaginaries are implicated and contribute to contemporary religious practice? And to what extent does the notion of “urban religion” implicitly depend on its “others”? Does it reproduce the urban/rural distinction as one of the “great divides”  (Latour 1993) that have been central to the experience of modernity? In truth\, it is increasingly difficult to sustain sharp distinctions between rural and urban. Across Asia\, increased mobility especially patterns of rural/urban migration and the spread of communications and transport technologies connect urban and rural settings like never before improved education rates have seen the rise of an increasingly sophisticated\, cosmopolitan and politically engaged rural population. Yet nationalist constructions of identity and modernizing discourses across Asia have at once denigrated the rural\, “the peasantry”\, as backwards and in need of “development” while at the same time valorizing them as embodying traditional values and the essence of national identities. Religion is similarly implicated in such discourses\, at times standing for the “other” of modernity\, at others functioning as the locus of ethnic or national identities. \nYet so-called urban and rural religious practices do not constitute two opposed spheres of activity but are interconnected in various ways. Indeed\, it is frequently the very notion of an opposition between city and country that facilitates interactions and networks that traverse urban and rural contexts. For example\, urban religious institutions may recruit ritual specialists from the countryside because they are seen to have retained “correct” knowledge and techniques that urban practitioners have lost (Davis 2016)\, or city dwellers may see rural settings as sites of spiritual potential and seek out sites of pilgrimage\, of refuge or retreat. \nThis Summer School takes up these issues and asks how the study of contemporary religious life in Asia can benefit from “thinking beyond the city”\, whether “the city” is understood as a spatial entity\, a site of enquiry\, or as an analytical category. It will call into question many of the assumptions that go along with the study of urban religiosity and will attempt to bring “the urban” explicitly into relationship with its various “others” – such as the “rural”\, “hinterland”\, “periphery”\, or “village”. Central questions include: How do patterns of pilgrimage\, travel and tourism\, or the circulation of religious symbols or objects connect “urban” and “rural”? How do religious networks and practices help particular actors – such as rural/urban migrants – to negotiate tensions between their rural and urban lives? How do notions of nostalgia and pastness figure in projects of urban religio-spiritual renewal? How do dialectics of religion\, secularity and rationality play out in rural/urban spaces? And to what extent does the notion of an urban/rural divide itself inform religious practices and imaginaries? A final avenue of questioning focuses on the hierarchization of city and country and the relative superiority and agency attributed to the former. Just as postcolonial and critical theory have\nchallenged discourses that contrast a dynamic and active occident with a relatively static\, passive orient\, the Summer School will critically examine the manner in which similar distinctions between city and country have inflected the study of religion in Asia. It will ask how “provincializing” the city can lead to new insights and approaches that can reveal blindspots and draw attention to power differentials in Asian societies. The purpose would be to challenge the processes of othering that assign a relatively passive or reactive role for the countryside and to instead draw attention to the agency of rural actors\, to alternative imaginaries of the future\, and to ask what role religion plays in specifically rural modernities. \nThe summer school thus invites participants to engage with\, and develop\, their own work through an exploration of the way religion and spirituality intersect with three key themes: (1) traversing and transcending the rural/urban divide; (2) the city and its “others”; (3) provincializing the city. A range of international speakers has been invited whose collective expertise connects questions of rural/urban religiosities and critical engagements with the category of “the city” in contemporary Asia. An innovative approach of this Summer School is to include both scholars who work on religion and those do not but whose research aims to critically engage with the category of “the city”. This combination of perspectives is expected to produce stimulating exchange and novel insights. \nSpeakers will include: \n\nProf. Michael Herzfeld\, Harvard University\nProf. Ursula Rao\, Leipzig University\nProf. Christina Schwenkel\, UC Riverside\nProf. Julia Huang\, National Tsing Hua University\, Taiwan (tentative)\nDr. Radhika Gupta\, Göttingen University\n\nProf. Herzfeld will provide a public keynote as well as a general workshop on successful thesis writing. Podium discussions and morning lectures will provide theoretical frames and ethnographic snapshots from diverse Asian contexts. In addition\, students will participate in small working and reading groups moderated and mentored by each of the invited speakers over the course of the School. Mandatory readings for these sessions will be shared in advance. Participants will have the opportunity to introduce their own work in working groups\, to connect their research to each of the three theme blocs\, in order to develop new ideas and learn new approaches for their own work. \nHighlights of the cultural program include: \n\nA visit to the historic Bodenwerder synagogue from 1825\, which was translocated to Göttingen in 2006 to find out about the transformation of religious sites in a local context.\nA city tour\, including guided tours of historically significant cemeteries.\n\nAbout the organizers\nGISCA\, CEMIS and CeMEAS are key institutions building research\, network and outreach capacities in the study of religions at Göttingen Research campus (GRC). Bringing together scholars in the social sciences and humanities for inter-disciplinary dialogue\, they in particular foster an appreciation of regional diversity and intra- and cross-regional entanglements in Asia. With GISCA’s expertise in the anthropology of Southeast Asia and CEMIS and CeMEAS core competence in South and East Asia respectively\, these centers complement each other\, join creative forces and pool their excellent academic networks to organize this Summer School. \nContact\nKarin Klenke at karin.klenke@cemis.uni-goettingen.de\nhttps://www.uni-goettingen.de/de/531996.html
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/summer-school-gottingen-spirit-2016-beyond-city-limits-rethinking-new-religiosities-asia/
LOCATION:Kulturwissenschaftliches Zentrum (KWZ)
CATEGORIES:Conference,Lecture,Workshop
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20150924
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20150927
DTSTAMP:20150225T091757Z
CREATED:20150225T091757Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20150225T091757Z
UID:3653-1443052800-1443311999@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:19. Tagung des Fachverbandes Chinesisch
DESCRIPTION:19. Tagung des Fachverbandes Chinesisch\n24. – 26. September 2015\n \nAnmeldung / 报名 / Registration \nHier finden Sie das Anmeldeformular für die Jahrestagung des Fachverbands Chinesisch in Göttingen. Für eine frühzeitige Anmeldung wären wir sehr dankbar.\n 下面是此次哥廷根汉语教学会议报名表的链接，麻烦各位尽快报名，非常感谢。\n Here you find the registration form for the upcoming conference of the Chinese Language Teachers Association of Germany\, Austria and Switzerland. Kindly fill in the form at your earliest convenience.\n\n  \nCall for papers: Deutsch 中文 English \n\nVorläufiges Tagungsprogramm 会议议程  (Stand 07.09.2015) \nWegweiser 会议地点指南 \nHotels \nIn den nachfolgenden Hotels wurden Kontingente für Teilnehmer der Tagung reserviert. Bitte reservieren Sie Ihr Hotelzimmer so früh wie möglich indem Sie direkt Kontakt mit dem Hotel aufnehmen und sich als Teilnehmer/in der Tagung des Fachverbands Chinesisch zu erkennen geben. \n以下我們列出了幾家推薦的旅館。我們已經請旅館為與會人士保留一些房間，但我們建議您盡早預訂（請勿使用旅館網頁上之預訂表格，可直接通過電子郵件或電話訂房），以免向隅。訂房時請告知旅館您是Fachverband Chinesisch會議的與會者。 \nParticipants are recommended to reserve accommodation as early as possible. A number of hotel rooms are available for participants of the conference. Please contact the hotel directly by phone or e-mail and specify that you wish to book as a participant of the “Fachverband Chinesisch” conference. \n  \nStadt Hannover (77–112 €)\nhttp://www.hotelstadthannover.de/\nDeadline: 24. August \n  \nHotel Central (82–105 €)\nhttp://www.hotel-central.com/home_de.html\nDeadline: 12. August \n  \nLeine Hotel (66–99 €) \nStartseite \n\nDeadline: 3. August \n  \nNovostar (90-110 €)\nhttp://www.novostar.de/goettingen/\nDeadline: 3. August \n  \nDie Jahrestagung wird von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gefördert. \n \n  \nWir danken außerdem den folgenden Sponsoren: \n \n  \n \n  \n \n  \n \n  \n \n  \n \n 
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/19-tagung-des-fachverbandes-chinesisch/
CATEGORIES:Conference
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20150611
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20150614
DTSTAMP:20150225T092916Z
CREATED:20150225T092916Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20150225T092916Z
UID:3655-1433980800-1434239999@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:Language Diversity in the Sinophone World: Policies\, effects\, and tradition
DESCRIPTION:Language Diversity in the Sinophone World: Policies\, effects\, and tradition\nInternational Symposium\n 11 – 13 June 2015\nGöttingen University\, Historical Observatory\n\nDescription  \nLanguage diversity is a ubiquitous feature in the sinophone world. In the past and present\, language planning agencies in the area commonly – if not uncontroversially – referred to as “Greater China” have responded differently to the challenges of multilingualism. After several decades of national language policy\, Mandarin is now widely used and broadly accepted in Mainland China\, Singapore\, and Taiwan. It is used to a much lesser degree in Hong Kong and Macao\, where Cantonese\, the major regional language\, arguably enjoys a higher prestige than other so‐called “dialects” elsewhere. At the same time\, there are notable differences with regard to international language planning – most important\, the incorporation of English into school curricula and/or the acceptance of English as an official language. \nOne purpose of the symposium is to bring together scholars who are working on language planning and official responses to language diversity. Another purpose is to compare the effects of language planning and the manifestations of language diversity in the daily lives of the speakers. Lastly\, we aim at situating the conference theme in a historical context. The reason behind this historical contextualization is to find out to what extent language-related phenomena are imbedded in Chinese traditions\, and to what extent they can be accounted for by analytical approaches that are not bound to Chinese culture and/or history. Topics include language contact phenomena (e.g.\, code mixing)\, multilingualism in classrooms\, language variation and language use in the media\, and nonofficial language ideologies and activities of language revivalist groups. \nKeep updated here\n \n  \n 
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/l/
LOCATION:Historical Observatory\, Geismar Landstraße 11\, Göttingen
CATEGORIES:Conference
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20150202T150000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20150202T173000
DTSTAMP:20150127T083342Z
CREATED:20150127T083342Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20150127T083342Z
UID:3607-1422889200-1422898200@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:2. Göttinger Wirtschaftstag China - Wissenschaftliches Symposium
DESCRIPTION:VR China: Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft gemeinsam unterwegs\n2. Göttinger Wirtschaftstag China – Wissenschaftliches Symposium (öffentlich) \n2. Februar 2015\n15 – 17.30 Uhr\nAula der Universität Göttingen \nWeitere Informationen finden Sie hier
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/3607/
CATEGORIES:Conference
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20150115T160000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20150115T183000
DTSTAMP:20150115T084950Z
CREATED:20150115T084950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20150115T084950Z
UID:3567-1421337600-1421346600@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:German Japanese Colloquium 2015
DESCRIPTION:German- Japanese Colloqium 2015\nKnowledge Transfer across Borders: Integrative Approaches\nWednesday\, January 14\, 2015\n4pm – 6:30pm\nAssembly Hall\, Wilhelmsplatz 1\, 37073 Göttingen \nThe festive opening of the international conference on “Knowledge Transfer Across Borders” is open to all.\n \nIn today’s globalized\, knowledge-intensive world\, the accumulation and transfer of knowledge has become a key success factor for organizations. However\, knowledge transfer is complex due to the difficulties in defining\, storing and circulating knowledge. This challenge increases even more when knowledge is transferred across national\, cultural and linguistic borders. Despite the importance of the topic\, prior research has been fragmented and sometimes inconclusive\, partly due to disciplinary boundaries. The two keynote speakers address these challenges from their respective academic backgrounds\, neurobiology and international business. \nKeynotes by\nProf. Dr. Atsushi Iriki (RIKEN Brain Science Institute\, Wako City\, Japan)\nEvolutionary Biology of the Human Mind\nProf. Dr. Markus Pudelko (International Business\, University of Tübingen)\nKnowledge Transfer in Multinational Cooperations
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/3567/
LOCATION:Assembly Hall\, Wilhelmsplatz 1\, Göttingen\, 37073
CATEGORIES:Conference
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20141127T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20141127T180000
DTSTAMP:20141028T104542Z
CREATED:20141028T104542Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20141028T104542Z
UID:3457-1417093200-1417111200@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:Tiananmen then and now
DESCRIPTION:Tian’anmen Then and Now: Memories and Legacies\nNovember 27\, 2014\n13:00 – 18:00\nHistorical Building of the State and University Library Göttingen\nLecture Hall\nGöttingen\, Am Papendiek 14\, 37073 Göttingen \n \n \nTo explore various dimension of this grave moment in reform-era China\, we are bringing together many of the world’s leading authorities on Tian’anmen\, including Rowena He (Harvard University)\, Wu Guogang (University of Victoria)\, Chang Ping (journalist and author)\, Louisa Lim (University of Michigan)\, Jackie Sheehan (University College Cork)\, Patricia Thornton (University of Oxford)\, Frank Pieke (Leiden University) and Felix Wemheuer (University of Cologne). \nPlease click here for detailed program information.   \nSpeakers:\nProf. Rowena Xiaoqing He (Harvard University)\n Prof. Wu Guoguang (University of Victoria)\n Louisa Lim (University of Michigan\, NPR-National Public Radio)\n Chang Ping (journalist and author) \nCommentators:\n Prof. Felix Wemheuer (Universität Köln)\nProf. Patricia Thornton (University of Oxford)\n Prof. Jacqueline Sheehan (University College Cork)\n Prof. Frank Pieke (Leiden University) \nPhoto:  Alan Yeh CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 https://flic.kr/p/8cvdxy (picture detail)\n \n  \n  \n  \n  \n 
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/tiananmen-now-2/
CATEGORIES:CeMEAS Podium,Conference
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR