BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CeMEAS - ECPv6.15.16//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.cemeas.de
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CeMEAS
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20190331T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20191027T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20200329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20201025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20201001T080000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20201031T170000
DTSTAMP:20260521T081247
CREATED:20201015T084541Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201015T091156Z
UID:8643-1601539200-1604163600@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:Video: Fractured Mirror: New Revolutionary History (新革命史) and the Search for China’s Future
DESCRIPTION:The online presentation “Fractured Mirror: New Revolutionary History (新革命史) and the Search for China’s Future” of Prof. Dr. Timothy Cheek from University of British Columbia is now here available on youtube.\n \nConference Keynote of “Whither China?”\, October 1st\, 2020  \n  \n \n“Whither China?” requires\, of course\, a clear sense of “whence China?” Chinese historiography over the past century or more has continued to contribute to this retrospective assessment and prospective speculation. Any assessment of Chinese historiography perforce reprises many of the central themes in the work of Dr. Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik: the internationalization of the study of Chinese history (both inside China and outside)\, the centrality of politics and morality in Chinese historiography\, and the search today for a new master narrative. I follow these themes in the case of recent Chinese historiography that has been reconsidering China’s Twentieth Century revolutions\, what is often referred to as “New Revolutionary History” (新革命史). I see three important worlds of conversation about China’s recent past: the official 官方\, the academic 学术\, and the social 民间. Xi Jinping has led an official Party effort to re-assert an orthodox reading of “the first thirty years and the second thirty years” of the PRC. Scholars in PRC universities have produced a wide range of empirical and theoretical studies\, many of which seek a scientific understanding of China’s revolutionary past. Increasingly\, independent scholars\, artists\, and activists have availed themselves of the new media (from convenient video recording to the internet) to offer unofficial readings of this history from which to draw their own meaning. Each seeks to shape the collective memory of “China\,” yet different official policies\, different academic schools\, and different communities across China’s continental-sized society offer distinct\, often different and sometimes conflicting narratives. As both Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik and Arif Dirlik have noted for historical universality\, any comprehensive Chinese history must be a sum of these particularities. Timothy Cheek is Director of the Institute of Asian Research and Louis Cha Chair Professor of Chinese Research at the School of Public Policy and Global Affairs and Department of History at the University of British Columbia. His research\, teaching and translating focus on the recent history of China\, especially the Chinese Communist Party and intellectual debate in China. https://sppga.ubc.ca/profile/timothy-… Co-oganized by the Department of East Asian Studies/Sinology (University of Vienna) https://sinologie.univie.ac.at/ & the Centre for Modern East Asian Studies (University of Göttingen) http://www.cemeas.de. Prof. Timothy Cheek’s lecture is the public keynote of „Whither China?“ 中國的未來與未來在中國\, a conference taking place October 2-3\, 2020 at the Department of East Asian Studies\, University of Vienna. Conference program: https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/o:1111122
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/video-fractured-mirror-new-revolutionary-history-%e6%96%b0%e9%9d%a9%e5%91%bd%e5%8f%b2-and-the-search-for-chinas-future/
CATEGORIES:Lecture
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.cemeas.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/tim.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20201001T171500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20201001T191500
DTSTAMP:20260521T081247
CREATED:20200923T073127Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20200924T110528Z
UID:8615-1601572500-1601579700@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:Zoom Lecture: Fractured Mirror: New Revolutionary History (新革命史) and the Search for China’s Future
DESCRIPTION:Fractured Mirror: New Revolutionary History (新革命史) and the Search for China’s Future\n  \n  \n  \n  \n  \nLecturer: Prof. Dr. Timothy Cheek (University of British Columbia)\nTime: Thursday\, October 1st\, 2020\,  5.15 p.m. Central European Summer Time (Berlin)\nZoom: https://uni-goettingen.zoom.us/j/92488442758\n \nCo-oganized by the Department of East Asian Studies/Sinology (University of Vienna) & the Centre for Modern East Asian Studies (University of Göttingen).\nProf. Timothy Cheek’s lecture is the public  keynote of  „Whither China“ 中國的未來與未來在中國\, a conference taking place October 2-3\, 2020 at the Department of East Asian Studies\, University of Vienna. \n“Whither China?” requires\, of course\, a clear sense of “whence China?” Chinese historiography over the past century or more has continued to contribute to this retrospective assessment and prospective speculation. Any assessment of Chinese historiography perforce reprises many of the central themes in the work of Dr. Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik: the internationalization of the study of Chinese history (both inside China and outside)\, the centrality of politics and morality in Chinese historiography\, and the search today for a new master narrative. I follow these themes in the case of recent Chinese historiography that has been reconsidering China’s Twentieth Century revolutions\, what is often referred to as “New Revolutionary History” (新革命史). I see three important worlds of conversation about China’s recent past: the official 官方\, the academic 学术\, and the social 民间. Xi Jinping has led an official Party effort to re-assert an orthodox reading of “the first thirty years and the second thirty years” of the PRC. Scholars in PRC universities have produced a wide range of empirical and theoretical studies\, many of which seek a scientific understanding of China’s revolutionary past. Increasingly\, independent scholars\, artists\, and activists have availed themselves of the new media (from convenient video recording to the internet) to offer unofficial readings of this history from which to draw their own meaning. Each seeks to shape the collective memory of “China\,” yet different official policies\, different academic schools\, and different communities across China’s continental-sized society offer distinct\, often different and sometimes conflicting narratives. As both Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik and Arif Dirlik have noted for historical universality\, any comprehensive Chinese history must be a sum of these particularities. \nTimothy Cheek is Director of the Institute of Asian Research and Louis Cha Chair Professor of Chinese Research at the School of Public Policy and Global Affairs and Department of History at the University of British Columbia. His research\, teaching and translating focus on the recent history of China\, especially the Chinese Communist Party and intellectual debate in China. His books include The Intellectual in Modern Chinese History (2015)\, Living with Reform: China Since 1989 (2006)\, Mao Zedong and China’s Revolutions (2002) and Propaganda and Culture in Mao’s China (1997)\, as well as edited volumes\, Mao’s Road to Power: Revolutionary Writings\, 1912-1949\, Vol. VIII (2015) with Stuart R. Schram\, The Cambridge Critical Introduction to Mao (2010)\, and New Perspectives on State Socialism in China (1997)\, with Tony Saich. In recent years Cheek has been working with some Chinese intellectuals to explore avenues of collaborative research and translation. https://sppga.ubc.ca/profile/timothy-cheek/
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/zoom-lecture-fractured-mirror-new-revolutionary-history-%e6%96%b0%e9%9d%a9%e5%91%bd%e5%8f%b2-and-the-search-for-chinas-future/
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.cemeas.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Photo-Cheek-1.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20201024T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20201024T170000
DTSTAMP:20260521T081247
CREATED:20201021T125510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20201021T125510Z
UID:8653-1603548000-1603558800@www.cemeas.de
SUMMARY:Online Drama Reading: 约翰·洛根《红色》John Logan\, Red
DESCRIPTION:约翰·洛根《红色》John Logan\, Red \nTime: 14: 00 – 17: 00 24. October 2020  \nPlace: Online (VooV Meeting ID：877 506 987) \nEmail: yingming.theater@gmail.com \nManner: Participants will read dramas and do some role-play exercises together via video or voice calls. Being an auditor is also welcome. \n“There is only one thing I fear in life\, my friend… One day the black will swallow the red\,” mentioned by Rothko. In his eyes\, what does “black” mean in this play? For his young assistant\, Ken\, what about his ideas towards “red?” Besides\, which is your option between black and red based on culture and aesthetics? \nIf you would like to know more about Rothko and Ken’s discussions\, let’s read John Logan’s Red together.  \nFor more information about the Chinese Theater in Goettingen\, please click here.
URL:https://www.cemeas.de/event/online-drama-reading-%e7%ba%a6%e7%bf%b0%c2%b7%e6%b4%9b%e6%a0%b9%e3%80%8a%e7%ba%a2%e8%89%b2%e3%80%8bjohn-logan-red/
LOCATION:VooV
CATEGORIES:Theater
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://www.cemeas.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/index.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR